<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Why Is PCLinuxOS 2007 Better Than Ubuntu ?</title> <atom:link href="http://techbu.com/2008/06/29/why-is-pclinuxos-2007-better-than-ubuntu/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://techbu.com/2008/06/29/why-is-pclinuxos-2007-better-than-ubuntu</link> <description>Latest technology, Social media news and computing tips</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:29:32 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Hombre</title><link>http://techbu.com/2008/06/29/why-is-pclinuxos-2007-better-than-ubuntu#comment-306531</link> <dc:creator>Hombre</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://techbu.com/?p=470#comment-306531</guid> <description>Amiga. Truly innovative was first in GUI , not apple
email me for more info</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amiga. Truly innovative was first in GUI , not apple<br
/> email me for more info</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: iwan</title><link>http://techbu.com/2008/06/29/why-is-pclinuxos-2007-better-than-ubuntu#comment-78950</link> <dc:creator>iwan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:59:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://techbu.com/?p=470#comment-78950</guid> <description>what ever it takes, u got it all free right??? why u should talk too much about it!!we all are in the same OS(linux)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what ever it takes, u got it all free right??? why u should talk too much about it!!</p><p>we all are in the same OS(linux)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gramps</title><link>http://techbu.com/2008/06/29/why-is-pclinuxos-2007-better-than-ubuntu#comment-75051</link> <dc:creator>Gramps</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 15:21:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://techbu.com/?p=470#comment-75051</guid> <description>This could have been a good comparision if it would have compared apples to apples. Both distros have a Gnome &amp; KDE version not to mention the others like LXDE, XFCE, Openbox, etc.If you wanted to compare Gnome to KDE then  it should have been titled that way. Itr made some good points but most of them had nothing to do with PCLOS &amp; Ubuntu.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could have been a good comparision if it would have compared apples to apples. Both distros have a Gnome &amp; KDE version not to mention the others like LXDE, XFCE, Openbox, etc.</p><p>If you wanted to compare Gnome to KDE then  it should have been titled that way. Itr made some good points but most of them had nothing to do with PCLOS &amp; Ubuntu.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Niels</title><link>http://techbu.com/2008/06/29/why-is-pclinuxos-2007-better-than-ubuntu#comment-63706</link> <dc:creator>Niels</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:27:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://techbu.com/?p=470#comment-63706</guid> <description>Hey man,Calm down yourself. don&#039;t you see you&#039;re kinda flippin out yourself?This person is only giving his opinion, and that&#039;s something which is allowed. It depends per person wether you agree with that or not, and wether you think it is usable.So. Thing about it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey man,</p><p>Calm down yourself. don&#8217;t you see you&#8217;re kinda flippin out yourself?</p><p>This person is only giving his opinion, and that&#8217;s something which is allowed. It depends per person wether you agree with that or not, and wether you think it is usable.</p><p>So. Thing about it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ENIGMA</title><link>http://techbu.com/2008/06/29/why-is-pclinuxos-2007-better-than-ubuntu#comment-43512</link> <dc:creator>ENIGMA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:17:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://techbu.com/?p=470#comment-43512</guid> <description>UBUNTU ALL THE WAY... KDE MIGHT HAVE ITS ADVANTAGES BUT UBUNTU AND GNOME ARE JUST SIMPLE TO USE AND STRAIGHT TO THE POINT... IF LOOKS IS WHAT U CARE ABOUT... GET GNOME THEMES ONLINE... UBUNTU WILL IN THE LONG RUN SHOW WHY ITS BEEN THE DISTRIO OF CHOICE AMONG THE MAYORITY OF US FOR SO LONG... PCLOS WILL HAVE TO STAY HAPPY BEING NUMBER 2.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UBUNTU ALL THE WAY&#8230; KDE MIGHT HAVE ITS ADVANTAGES BUT UBUNTU AND GNOME ARE JUST SIMPLE TO USE AND STRAIGHT TO THE POINT&#8230; IF LOOKS IS WHAT U CARE ABOUT&#8230; GET GNOME THEMES ONLINE&#8230; UBUNTU WILL IN THE LONG RUN SHOW WHY ITS BEEN THE DISTRIO OF CHOICE AMONG THE MAYORITY OF US FOR SO LONG&#8230; PCLOS WILL HAVE TO STAY HAPPY BEING NUMBER 2.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: michel cheong</title><link>http://techbu.com/2008/06/29/why-is-pclinuxos-2007-better-than-ubuntu#comment-30295</link> <dc:creator>michel cheong</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:25:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://techbu.com/?p=470#comment-30295</guid> <description>gnome and kde are just an environment. If you use debian and you can have both of them to choose at startup .</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gnome and kde are just an environment. If you use debian and you can have both of them to choose at startup .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carlos</title><link>http://techbu.com/2008/06/29/why-is-pclinuxos-2007-better-than-ubuntu#comment-29059</link> <dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://techbu.com/?p=470#comment-29059</guid> <description>Yes I do love PCLinuxOS.Why? KDE, Beryl, Slick theme, easy to useI hate RPMs. I will admit, the only reason why I like PCLOS is because it is nice and slick working OUT OF the Boxtrust me I got ubuntu doing all the a bove, and RPMs suck, deb rox</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I do love PCLinuxOS.</p><p>Why? KDE, Beryl, Slick theme, easy to use</p><p>I hate RPMs. I will admit, the only reason why I like PCLOS is because it is nice and slick working OUT OF the Box</p><p>trust me I got ubuntu doing all the a bove, and RPMs suck, deb rox</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daniel Green</title><link>http://techbu.com/2008/06/29/why-is-pclinuxos-2007-better-than-ubuntu#comment-24414</link> <dc:creator>Daniel Green</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:04:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://techbu.com/?p=470#comment-24414</guid> <description>Looking at both sides, I think better wording would satisfy both groups. Something that communicates that Ubuntu has Gnome installed by default, but can be replaced with full KDE support. Gnome is a very small piece of what Ubuntu is, so saying that Ubuntu is based on it is misleading. That all it takes to write a new flavor is a list of preferred packages and some non-ubuntu-specific configuration demonstrates that (hence Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Edubuntu, (\w+ubuntu)). However, your argument continues to have weight because while it is a small piece, it is (ostensibly) what the common user will be interacting with. Although, still, I feel that it is nevertheless important to note that with a quick installation of the Kubuntu package, you have KDE installed configured with an entire package suite of programs beginning with the letter K to replace the ones installed by default. I&#039;ve used both KDE and Gnome, and I will admit that when running on a suitably powerful machine, KDE, when not crashing, takes the cake in my book. That situation, for me, has not come up too frequently. As for Gnome... I don&#039;t bother anymore. Generally I do a server install of Ubuntu, chose no server packages, and install what I need when I need it. I&#039;ve blabbed on long enough.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at both sides, I think better wording would satisfy both groups. Something that communicates that Ubuntu has Gnome installed by default, but can be replaced with full KDE support. Gnome is a very small piece of what Ubuntu is, so saying that Ubuntu is based on it is misleading. That all it takes to write a new flavor is a list of preferred packages and some non-ubuntu-specific configuration demonstrates that (hence Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Edubuntu, (\w+ubuntu)). However, your argument continues to have weight because while it is a small piece, it is (ostensibly) what the common user will be interacting with. Although, still, I feel that it is nevertheless important to note that with a quick installation of the Kubuntu package, you have KDE installed configured with an entire package suite of programs beginning with the letter K to replace the ones installed by default. I&#8217;ve used both KDE and Gnome, and I will admit that when running on a suitably powerful machine, KDE, when not crashing, takes the cake in my book. That situation, for me, has not come up too frequently. As for Gnome&#8230; I don&#8217;t bother anymore. Generally I do a server install of Ubuntu, chose no server packages, and install what I need when I need it. I&#8217;ve blabbed on long enough.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Umakant</title><link>http://techbu.com/2008/06/29/why-is-pclinuxos-2007-better-than-ubuntu#comment-17695</link> <dc:creator>Umakant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:32:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://techbu.com/?p=470#comment-17695</guid> <description>hey pclinuxos is great well its kde with the best as compared to ubuntu (with kde )
even mint linux(built on ubuntu) is better and more polished as compared to ubuntu gnome</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey pclinuxos is great well its kde with the best as compared to ubuntu (with kde )<br
/> even mint linux(built on ubuntu) is better and more polished as compared to ubuntu gnome</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Diogo Lima</title><link>http://techbu.com/2008/06/29/why-is-pclinuxos-2007-better-than-ubuntu#comment-15932</link> <dc:creator>Diogo Lima</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:01:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://techbu.com/?p=470#comment-15932</guid> <description>Why PCLOS... why Ubuntu... we shall pass this throught lots of days...
&gt;&gt; My opinions:: Ubuntu:
Ubuntu is a nice really nice distro that makes changes each day... but it is not a rolling release... each new realease will follow a dvd.. also the codecs and stuff is a matter or taste...Deb and RPM are two great packages... its a matter of taste too:: PCLOS:
I personally prefer this one... but for noobies this is just great if with the basis... if you want more you should learn more about linux... Different from ubuntu which has better repositories... but ubuntu has the fames &quot;don&#039;t mix with me or I&#039;m going to crash&quot; way... PCLOS doesn&#039;t...PCLOS has one kind of problem... it has a year release cycle... ubuntu has a 6 months one... but this is not a problem... PCLOS is way better tested and way faster...&gt;&gt;&gt; The matter of usage...
PCLOS has KDE: yes,
Ubuntu has GNOME: yes...
KDE is usually slower then GNOME: yes...But even though PCLOS is way faster then Ubuntu, also try MiniMe edition its even faster because it is stripped down...Also... ubuntu&#039;s community is bigger then PCLOS, but go on an IRC of PCLOS and one of Ubuntu&#039;s... see the issues that ubuntu&#039;s talk and that PCLOS talk... also ubuntu is now a big community because once it was a PCLOS... one distro doesn&#039;t get over with another... ubuntu is a community for developing a commercial version for canonical as fedora is for Red Hat Enterprise Linux&gt;&gt;&gt; ::: Just my opinions...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why PCLOS&#8230; why Ubuntu&#8230; we shall pass this throught lots of days&#8230;<br
/> &gt;&gt; My opinions</p><p>:: Ubuntu:<br
/> Ubuntu is a nice really nice distro that makes changes each day&#8230; but it is not a rolling release&#8230; each new realease will follow a dvd.. also the codecs and stuff is a matter or taste&#8230;</p><p> Deb and RPM are two great packages&#8230; its a matter of taste too</p><p>:: PCLOS:<br
/> I personally prefer this one&#8230; but for noobies this is just great if with the basis&#8230; if you want more you should learn more about linux&#8230; Different from ubuntu which has better repositories&#8230; but ubuntu has the fames &#8220;don&#8217;t mix with me or I&#8217;m going to crash&#8221; way&#8230; PCLOS doesn&#8217;t&#8230;</p><p> PCLOS has one kind of problem&#8230; it has a year release cycle&#8230; ubuntu has a 6 months one&#8230; but this is not a problem&#8230; PCLOS is way better tested and way faster&#8230;</p><p>&gt;&gt;&gt; The matter of usage&#8230;<br
/> PCLOS has KDE: yes,<br
/> Ubuntu has GNOME: yes&#8230;<br
/> KDE is usually slower then GNOME: yes&#8230;</p><p>But even though PCLOS is way faster then Ubuntu, also try MiniMe edition its even faster because it is stripped down&#8230;</p><p>Also&#8230; ubuntu&#8217;s community is bigger then PCLOS, but go on an IRC of PCLOS and one of Ubuntu&#8217;s&#8230; see the issues that ubuntu&#8217;s talk and that PCLOS talk&#8230; also ubuntu is now a big community because once it was a PCLOS&#8230; one distro doesn&#8217;t get over with another&#8230; ubuntu is a community for developing a commercial version for canonical as fedora is for Red Hat Enterprise Linux</p><p>&gt;&gt;&gt; ::: Just my opinions&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: techbu.com @ 2012-05-23 11:05:41 by W3 Total Cache -->
